Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Open Letter to Gateway Contractors

Transtoll Inc., The Macquarie Group, Flatiron Construction Corp., Kiewit Corporation,

I am writing to ask that you cancel your participation in the Metro Vancouver (Canada) “Gateway Program” as it is currently planned. Instead you should negotiate with the public and provincial government to create a new program that is environmentally sustainable and financial viable. Highway expansion does not fit these criteria.

Here are a few reasons to withdraw from the Gateway Program:

1. Reduced revenues as a result of carbon reduction programs.

Programs like BC's carbon tax are designed to encourage people to drive less. Fewer vehicle trips means less revenues for the private partner.

2. Reduced revenues as a result of peak oil.

We are already seeing people reducing their vehicle trips as a result of recent spikes in gasoline prices. As the price of a finite resources increases we will see further reductions in potential revenues.

3. Increased costs.

Rising oil prices also means increased costs for pavement – a basic component of highway construction.

4. Public Opinion.

There is widespread opposition to the Gateway Program in BC and participation in that program could be a public relations nightmare.

5. Protests.

Two recent highway expansion projects (Sea to Sky and Bear Mountain) were delayed for months by protests.

6. Financing.

The current situation in the global financial markets makes financing the project extremely difficult.

7. It is the right thing to do.

The Gateway Program will increase emissions from the sector that is already the highest source of greenhouse gas emissions in this region. It will also increase pollution that is responsible for health problems. Climate change has been called the greatest moral issue that our generation faces.

Sincerely,

Rob_

(For contact info to send your own letter: http://www.ecocascadia.org/BCCC.shtml )

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Open Letter to Gordon Campbell

I would like thank you for setting a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in British Columbia by 33 per cent by 2020. This is an important step (although the science seems to indicate that we must reduce emissions even more quickly – 90% by 20301). As well, I thank you for introducing a carbon tax that is also small step towards reaching that goal.


In planning to meet these goals it would make sense to tackle the largest contributions to greenhouse gas emissions first.


As you may know here in the Lower Mainland the largest source of green house gas emissions is light vehicles. If we are going to meet the targets you have set out we will have to dramatically reduce the amount of single-occupancy vehicles (SOV) trips and replace those with trips on public transit (preferably electric powered). The mainstream available technology for light vehicles, such as hybrid propulsion, will not make enough of a difference to meet your targets even if the majority of car users purchase new vehicles immediately.


Given these facts the Gateway Program as it is currently planned does not make any sense. Why build more lanes on Highway One if we are going to have to reduce SOV trips so significantly that those lanes are no longer needed? Once SOV trips are reduced there will be plenty of room for transit and the 8-10% of current traffic that is trucks.


All experts agree that Gateway Program as currently planned will actually increase emissions. The Gateway Program should be revamped and all plans for highway expansion (with the exception of transit queue-jumper lanes) should be removed.


Please don't respond by telling me that transit is included in your plans. The 17% target for the distant future is too little too late. Many world-class western cities already have transit modal shares of 20-50%. We should striving to match these numbers as soon as possible.


Please don't respond by telling me that we need highway expansion to expand transit. Studies have been done that show queue jumpers would allow buses to easily move over the bridge – especially if traffic is reduced once people have the option of using transit.


Please keep your promise to fight climate change and redesign the Gateway Program.


Sincerely,

Rob Baxter

1As described by Monbiot in Heat based on a paper by Chris D. Jones et al., published in Geophysical Research Letters.