Sunday, December 18, 2005
Saturday, November 12, 2005
So here is who I am thinking of voting for in the Vancouver elections (subject to change):
WEST, Ben (yeah, I know that Jim Green is the lesser of two evils when compared to Sam Sullivan - but I can not in good conscience vote for a mayor from the party that abandoned their election promises, abandoned COPE, supported P3 programs (RAV) and voted to do business with a war criminals (SNC-Lavalin)).
- BASS, Fred COPE
- CADMAN, David COPE
- DEAL, Heather Vision Vancouver (based on her work with David Suzuki Foundation she seems to be the only one from Vision Vancouver with any credibility)
- LIVINGSTON, Ann Green Party of Vancouver
- LOUIS, Tim COPE
- POTVIN, Kevin (Don't agree with all of his positions but it might be good to have an independent on city council for a change)
- ROBERTS, Anne COPE
- WOODSWORTH, Ellen COPE
- KASSIS, Omar COPE
- LEHAN, Mel COPE (has a good reputation as a community activist and based on my conversations with him he seems committed to sustainability issues)
- MACKINNON, Stuart Green Party of Vancouver
- MANN, Tracey Jastinder
Green Party of Vancouver (a women of colour - we need a few more of these in government)
- MCGINN, Jenn COPE
- ROMANIUK, Anita COPE
- SUNSHINE, Earl P. (don't know much about this guy but if we are living on first nations land we probably should have some first nations people in government)
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
I also went to a couple of presentations on permaculture which I didn't find too helpful but they did encourage me to do more in that area.
There were also a lot of interesting products. Recognizing the inherent contradiction of over-consumption as part of a festival about sustainability, I managed to resist the urge to buy anything. However, in the future I probably will replace my plastic water bottle with one of these stainless steel ones and I may also get a portable UV water treatment system to replace the chemicals I currently use.
It was good to see a booth about salmon farming along with the other booths encouraging action on other important issues.
Sunday, October 23, 2005
However this claim does not match other data that I have seen.
For example one source claims that:
A bike requires 350 calories per 10 miles (supplied by the rider)
A car requires 18,000 calories per 10 miles
And other sources seem to support these numbers
Now even if you add the embedded energy of the food which according to the paper is 7 additional calories per calorie of food consumed, that is still only:
2,450 calories per mile for bikes
vs. 18,000 calories per mile for vehicles.
And this is still not including the embedded energy of the fuel for the automobile or the embedded energy for manufacturing the automobile (about 10 times that of the bike).
Monday, September 19, 2005
First Nations elders are being arrested in Northern B.C. after blockading roads to prevent mining and oil field development. It seems to me that these actions are significant from both the perspective of first nations rights and environmental protection. Yet there is not that much coverage of the issue in the mainstream media. A good blog of the events can be found at http://tahltan.blogspot.com
Sunday, September 18, 2005
- The bridge currently has over capacity for automobile traffic.
- Changing the signal configuration at Burrard and Pacific would overcome some of the problems from the 1996 experiment.
- In the past 20 years demand by cyclists and pedestrians has doubled on the bridge while vehicle demand has not changed.
- Converting vehicle lanes to cycling lanes as opposed to widening the bridge could save the city $11 million dollars.
- People have been seriously injured because of the current narrow bike lanes. If someone is killed the subsequent lawsuit will cost the city much more than doing nothing.
Tuesday, June 28, 2005
Well there is hope here along the Salish Coast that we may in fact be moving towards a more sustainable future.
Vancouver has been the seen some very successful street parties over the last couple of weeks. First huge crowds turned out for the Car Free Commercial Drive festival. And last weekend at least three streets were shut down for pedestrian oriented events - 4th Ave for the soapbox derby, Broadway for Greek Days and Water Street for the Jazz Fest.
And last weekend began with a Critical Mass bike ride that saw over 1,000 riders show up.
And tonight City Council rejected the car-oriented developments (Wal-Mart and Canadian Tire) on Marine Drive.
On a totally unrealted note, I've been thinking about critical realism.
Monday, June 20, 2005
Hearings began tonight on the Vancouver Wal-Mart store (see previous post). The architect involved tried to claim that the wind turbines would generate power. One of the experts they consulted has told me:
“...and my reports keep telling them there isn't enough wind. But Wal-Mart seems to feel their power extends to the weather. The rest of us realize we can't change the weather. I have insisted that it will be a very poor choice to install turbines at a site where they will be standing still most of the time. They remain firm in their belief that they do want the turbines. It's certainly a greenwash on their part.”
Monday, June 13, 2005
My response to an editorial in the Vancouver Sun:
It is unfortunate that the Vancouver Sun did not do a more critical analysis of Wal-Mart's proposal for "green" store on Southeast Marine Drive (editorial June 13th). For example, the windmill that Wal-Mart is proposing is unlikely to work in an urban environment (which is why the City rejected proposals for a windmill at southeast False Creek).
While Wal-Mart was attempting to "green-wash" it's image in Vancouver, it proposed a development on a sensitive salmon river estuary in Campbell River.
I also don't think we should ignore the fact that Wal-Mart is consistently ranked as the worst North American retailer for selling products produced in sweatshops. Wal-Mart is involved in the notorious factories of Saipan.
While the Sun's editorial references Wal-Mart's own study on the impact for local businesses it ignores the case studies across North America that show the devastating impact of Wal-Mart on local businesses.
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
Photo by Arthur Cayanan
The Vancouver Renewable Energy Co-op installed a solar photovoltaic (electric) system on the SPEC building this past weekend. It is one of the first grid-tie systems in Vancouver. The project still needs inspections before the grid connection can be completed.
Friday, June 03, 2005
At the MEC Annual General Meeting a resolution was passed, that will take some steps to reduce the use of plastic bags at MEC. I think they could have gone further but this is a move in the right direction.
Friday, April 01, 2005
I pointed out the success of solar power in Germany which receives less annual sunlight than Vancouver. She said I was wrong. So I double-checked.
Yes, Vancouver does receive more sun than cities in Germany. And yes Germany does use a lot of solar power. In fact, Germany now has the largest installed solar PV base – 300 MW compared to 280 in Japan and 90 in the US.
This is a classic example of green-washing. While Wal-Mart talks about building this “green” store in Vancouver, it insists on building a store on sensitive riparian habitat not too far away in Campbell River, BC.
It should also be pointed out that Wal-Mart rejected some of the engineering plans that would have made the store even more energy efficient.
The windmills are also a joke. There is not enough wind in this part of the city to power current wind mill technology efficiently. City planners have already rejected the use of windmills in southeast False Creek for that very reason.
Many of us in Vancouver hope that Vancouver will remain a “Wal-Mart Free Zone.”
Friday, March 04, 2005
Or maybe not....
Last weekend myself and seven other cyclists with bike trailers moved a friend across the city.
photo by Guy Vera
Friday, February 25, 2005
Tuesday, February 08, 2005
Here are my comments for a public hearing at Vancouer City Hall:
We who live in Vancouver often like to consider ourselves world leaders when it comes to environmental sustainability. Will the new South East False Creek development be a world leader in environmental sustainability?
There is no doubt that the planners and others that worked on this project have put a lot of hard work into it. It will undoubtedly be one of the most sustainable neighborhoods in the Lower Mainland and British Columbia. But will it be the a world leader? I have concerns that it may not be.
There are two areas that I would like to emphasize when looking at the sustainability of SE False Creek.
The first is transportation. I think a large portion (if not all) of the community should be car-free. I know this sounds like a radical idea but in actual fact it is not. Many cities around the world have car free areas. The planned community in Portugal has a goal of zero automobile use in its urban areas. Even Toronto has a community of over 300 people where private cars are not allowed. Do we really want to be behind Toronto when it comes to sustainability?
The second issue I would like to address is renewable energy. I realize that there has been some discussion of renewable energy in SE False Creek. But I am afraid that this will become a suggestion that is not widely implemented. The community in Portugal has a goal of 100% renewable energy use.
Ground source heat pumps should be used in as much of the area as is physically possible. Solar hot water systems should be required on all buildings with good southern exposure. Both of these are cost effective technologies that are already in use in Vancouver. Photovoltaics are less cost effective but should be incorporated where it is feasible.
And what about a wind turbine? Normally the urban environment would not be suitable for traditional wind turbines. But the open spaces along the edge of false creek might be a good spot for a mid-sized turbine. Toronto has a large wind turbine on the edge of its downtown core. Again why are we behind Toronto?
I think Vancouver deserves the best. I hope that we will work to create an example of sustainability that really is one of the best in the world.
Sunday, February 06, 2005
Saturday, January 29, 2005
I have been reading a little about the Word Social Forum specifically and Brazil generally. And this got me thinking about the future of economics and communities. Or at least what the future should be.
I think that we need to do away with the idea that we need some monolithic “ism.” We need to put both communism (authoritarian socialism) and capitalism in the history bin. And embrace the many wonderful alternatives that are already being developed. Things the like:
- The Open Source model (currently used for software development perhaps useful elsewhere) and the related ideas of a Creative Commons
- The Community Supported Agriculture model
- Cooperatives and Credit Unions
- The Emili-Romagna region in Italy
- Local Living Economies (David Korten's ideas and the BALLE movement)
- Social entrepreneurship (Ashoka)